Artificial intelligence is not merely a set of technical tools; it acts as a systemic force reshaping the architecture of human rights protection. This article argues that AI introduces a structural shift from traditional decision-making based on justification and human accountability to probabilistic, opaque, and adaptive governance. Drawing on critical theory, legal scholarship, and selected empirical examples from law enforcement, social media governance, and welfare systems, the study demonstrates how AI diffuses responsibility, constrains remedies, and redefines states’ positive obligations. The analysis situates AI as a systemic actor that challenges the foundational assumptions of international human rights law, emphasizing the cumulative and transversal nature of its impact. The article concludes by proposing a reconceptualization of responsibility, positive obligations, and remedies, highlighting the need for a theoretical framework capable of addressing the structural transformations AI introduces, and outlining directions for future research.

Artificial Intelligence and the Transformation of Human Rights: From Justification to Probability

Marco Marsili
Writing – Original Draft Preparation
2026

Abstract

Artificial intelligence is not merely a set of technical tools; it acts as a systemic force reshaping the architecture of human rights protection. This article argues that AI introduces a structural shift from traditional decision-making based on justification and human accountability to probabilistic, opaque, and adaptive governance. Drawing on critical theory, legal scholarship, and selected empirical examples from law enforcement, social media governance, and welfare systems, the study demonstrates how AI diffuses responsibility, constrains remedies, and redefines states’ positive obligations. The analysis situates AI as a systemic actor that challenges the foundational assumptions of international human rights law, emphasizing the cumulative and transversal nature of its impact. The article concludes by proposing a reconceptualization of responsibility, positive obligations, and remedies, highlighting the need for a theoretical framework capable of addressing the structural transformations AI introduces, and outlining directions for future research.
2026
12
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
RHR-26-318.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione dell'editore
Licenza: Accesso libero (no vincoli)
Dimensione 244.14 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
244.14 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in ARCA sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10278/5123989
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact