"Spectacular Transience., or, How to Undermine a Military Triumph on the Early Modern Stage"

This article examines the interpretation and refashioning of the Roman triumph motif within the theatrical culture of early modern England, contrasting its close connection with royal ceremonies and self-display against its paradoxical and ambivalent representation concerning fictional rulers in plays. It argues that the military triumph, with its associated martial imagery, enters into a dialogue with the triumphal discourse of masque-like entertainments and plays, yet is rarely, if ever, realized onstage. Through an analysis of texts ranging from Shakespeare’s Antony and Cleopatra, Henry V, and Julius Caesar back to Marlowe’s Tamburlaine, and extending to the triumphal masques of the Stuart kings, the essay demonstrates a progressive dematerialization of the military triumph. Instead of a concrete celebration of military victory, the triumph becomes a site of memory, aspiration, foreboding, and ultimately, a powerful cultural signifier used to explore themes of power, identity, and the ephemeral nature of royal power. The study reveals how the absent or transformed triumph in these theatrical contexts paradoxically gains lasting resonance in the cultural imagination, often glorifying the imagined captive or highlighting the performative and ultimately transient nature of monarchical power, as seen in the Stuart era’s shift towards peaceful and allegorical triumphs in their masques and royal self-representation.