We consider the problem of inference on the signs of n > 1 parameters. We aim to provide 1 - alpha post hoc confidence bounds on the number of positive and negative (or non-positive) parameters, with a simultaneous guarantee, for all subsets of parameters. We suggest to start by using the data to select the direction of the hypothesis test for each parameter; then, adjust the p-values of the one-sided hypotheses for the selection, and use the adjusted p-values for simultaneous inference on the selected n one-sided hypotheses. The adjustment is straightforward assuming the p-values of one-sided hypotheses have densities with monotone likelihood ratio, and are mutually independent. We show the bounds we provide are tighter (often by a great margin) than existing alternatives, and that they can be obtained by at most a polynomial time. We demonstrate their usefulness in the evaluation of treatment effects across studies or subgroups. Specifically, we provide a tight lower bound on the number of studies which are beneficial, as well as on the number of studies which are harmful (or non-beneficial), and in addition conclude on the effect direction of individual studies, while guaranteeing that the probability of at least one wrong inference is at most 0.05.

Simultaneous directional inference

Solari, Aldo
2023-01-01

Abstract

We consider the problem of inference on the signs of n > 1 parameters. We aim to provide 1 - alpha post hoc confidence bounds on the number of positive and negative (or non-positive) parameters, with a simultaneous guarantee, for all subsets of parameters. We suggest to start by using the data to select the direction of the hypothesis test for each parameter; then, adjust the p-values of the one-sided hypotheses for the selection, and use the adjusted p-values for simultaneous inference on the selected n one-sided hypotheses. The adjustment is straightforward assuming the p-values of one-sided hypotheses have densities with monotone likelihood ratio, and are mutually independent. We show the bounds we provide are tighter (often by a great margin) than existing alternatives, and that they can be obtained by at most a polynomial time. We demonstrate their usefulness in the evaluation of treatment effects across studies or subgroups. Specifically, we provide a tight lower bound on the number of studies which are beneficial, as well as on the number of studies which are harmful (or non-beneficial), and in addition conclude on the effect direction of individual studies, while guaranteeing that the probability of at least one wrong inference is at most 0.05.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in ARCA sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10278/5059421
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact