The essay reviews the main points of the Cassation sentence n. 1663/2020 on the Foodora case. The ruling states that art. 2 of Legislative Decree n. 81/2015 is a “disciplinary rule” and which has an anti-fraudulent function. These arguments are disputed. Instead, the Court’s orientation on the distinction between hetero-organization and coordination (art. 409, n. 3, Code of Civil Procedure) is appreciated, as well as the distinction, indeed unclear, with the employer’s management power and the subordination cases.
La Cassazione sul caso Foodora
Adalberto Perulli
2020-01-01
Abstract
The essay reviews the main points of the Cassation sentence n. 1663/2020 on the Foodora case. The ruling states that art. 2 of Legislative Decree n. 81/2015 is a “disciplinary rule” and which has an anti-fraudulent function. These arguments are disputed. Instead, the Court’s orientation on the distinction between hetero-organization and coordination (art. 409, n. 3, Code of Civil Procedure) is appreciated, as well as the distinction, indeed unclear, with the employer’s management power and the subordination cases.
File in questo prodotto:
| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Perulli_Massimario 2020_articolo_wGaNT_MGL.pdf
non disponibili
Tipologia:
Versione dell'editore
Licenza:
Copyright dell'editore
Dimensione
1.1 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.1 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in ARCA sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
