In Orders n. 66/2021 and 67/2021, the Constitutional Court denies two MPs the locus standi to challenge the Decrees of the Prime Minister (d.P.C.M.) adopted to cope with the Covid-19 pandemic. Despite this predictable outcome, the decision appears not to fully consider all the implications of parliamentary mandate in conjunction with the confi- dence rule governing the relationship between the Executive and the Legislative branches.
Parlamentari versus d.P.C.M.: due conflitti inammissibili per una questione non marginale
alessandro lauro
2021-01-01
Abstract
In Orders n. 66/2021 and 67/2021, the Constitutional Court denies two MPs the locus standi to challenge the Decrees of the Prime Minister (d.P.C.M.) adopted to cope with the Covid-19 pandemic. Despite this predictable outcome, the decision appears not to fully consider all the implications of parliamentary mandate in conjunction with the confi- dence rule governing the relationship between the Executive and the Legislative branches.
File in questo prodotto:
| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
GiurCost_2_2021_parlamentari_vs_DPCM.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Versione dell'editore
Licenza:
Accesso gratuito (solo visione)
Dimensione
469.71 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
469.71 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in ARCA sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
