This article examines Quintus Smyrnaeus’ variations on the motif of the earth soaked in blood in battle scenes. Homer expresses this motif in a series of formulas and expressions, whereas Quintus uses the same traditional vocabulary to create numerous variations. This paper analyses the difference between oral and written composition by taking some passages of the Posthomerica and the Homeric poems as examples. The motifs examined are earth soaked in blood, water and earth obstructed by bodies. This analysis shows that starting from Homeric formulas and expressions Quintus creates new images, thus showing originality in composing his poem. This article also analyses Quintus’ re-elaboration non only of epic but also of tragedy, which becomes clear in the prophetic dream of Hecuba (QS 14.278 s.), where the combination of the motif of a nursing mother and that of blood flowing creates a new and powerful image.

This article examines Quintus Smyrnaeus’ variations on the motif of the earth soaked in blood in battle scenes. Homer expresses this motif in a series of formulas and expressions, whereas Quintus uses the same traditional vocabulary to create numerous variations. This paper analyses the difference between oral and written composition by taking some passages of the Posthomerica and the Homeric poems as examples. The motifs examined are earth soaked in blood, water and earth obstructed by bodies. This analysis shows that starting from Homeric formulas and expressions Quintus creates new images, thus showing originality in composing his poem. This article also analyses Quintus’ re-elaboration non only of epic but also of tragedy, which becomes clear in the prophetic dream of Hecuba (QS 14.278 s.), where the combination of the motif of a nursing mother and that of blood flowing creates a new and powerful image.

La terra e il sangue (secondo Quinto Smirneo)

Katia Barbaresco
2019-01-01

Abstract

This article examines Quintus Smyrnaeus’ variations on the motif of the earth soaked in blood in battle scenes. Homer expresses this motif in a series of formulas and expressions, whereas Quintus uses the same traditional vocabulary to create numerous variations. This paper analyses the difference between oral and written composition by taking some passages of the Posthomerica and the Homeric poems as examples. The motifs examined are earth soaked in blood, water and earth obstructed by bodies. This analysis shows that starting from Homeric formulas and expressions Quintus creates new images, thus showing originality in composing his poem. This article also analyses Quintus’ re-elaboration non only of epic but also of tragedy, which becomes clear in the prophetic dream of Hecuba (QS 14.278 s.), where the combination of the motif of a nursing mother and that of blood flowing creates a new and powerful image.
2019
37
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Barbaresco2019 Lexis 37.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Documento in Post-print
Licenza: Accesso gratuito (solo visione)
Dimensione 1.63 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.63 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in ARCA sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10278/3736136
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 1
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact