Using tools from network theory, we analyze the organization of a MYH9-oriented druglike library in chemical space using a multidescriptor framework. The dataset is drawn from ZINC, a publicly available database of commercially accessible compounds curated for virtual screening and drug discovery. Starting from 6004 molecules, preprocessing yields 5000 structurally valid and descriptor-complete compounds. Similarity is defined via Tanimoto distance on Morgan fingerprints and single-descriptor distances for xLogP, HBD, HBA, molecular weight, and rotatable bonds. For each representation we construct k-nearest-neighbor networks and identify communities using the Louvain–Leiden algorithm. All networks exhibit highly significant modularity (Q=0.91−0.99) relative to degree-preserving null models, demonstrating pronounced nonrandom chemical organization across descriptors. Cross-descriptor robustness is quantified through a coclustering matrix over 1.25×107 molecular pairs, measuring how consistently compound pairs co-occur within the same community across descriptor-specific networks. Although most pairs show limited agreement, a sparse high-consensus core emerges, highlighting the complementarity of the descriptors. Minimum spanning trees derived from structural and consensus similarities reveal distinct backbone topologies: a scaffold-driven, sparse structure versus a compact, hub-rich consensus network. Betweenness centrality on these backbones identifies compounds that are both structurally central and descriptor-balanced. These results provide a statistically validated network representation of chemical space and a principled strategy to extract consensus-stable compounds for downstream screening.

Network-based drug repurposing for MYH9-related nephritis

Gili, Tommaso;Caldarelli, Guido
2026

Abstract

Using tools from network theory, we analyze the organization of a MYH9-oriented druglike library in chemical space using a multidescriptor framework. The dataset is drawn from ZINC, a publicly available database of commercially accessible compounds curated for virtual screening and drug discovery. Starting from 6004 molecules, preprocessing yields 5000 structurally valid and descriptor-complete compounds. Similarity is defined via Tanimoto distance on Morgan fingerprints and single-descriptor distances for xLogP, HBD, HBA, molecular weight, and rotatable bonds. For each representation we construct k-nearest-neighbor networks and identify communities using the Louvain–Leiden algorithm. All networks exhibit highly significant modularity (Q=0.91−0.99) relative to degree-preserving null models, demonstrating pronounced nonrandom chemical organization across descriptors. Cross-descriptor robustness is quantified through a coclustering matrix over 1.25×107 molecular pairs, measuring how consistently compound pairs co-occur within the same community across descriptor-specific networks. Although most pairs show limited agreement, a sparse high-consensus core emerges, highlighting the complementarity of the descriptors. Minimum spanning trees derived from structural and consensus similarities reveal distinct backbone topologies: a scaffold-driven, sparse structure versus a compact, hub-rich consensus network. Betweenness centrality on these backbones identifies compounds that are both structurally central and descriptor-balanced. These results provide a statistically validated network representation of chemical space and a principled strategy to extract consensus-stable compounds for downstream screening.
2026
114
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
v4k3-49dx.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione dell'editore
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 2.73 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
2.73 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in ARCA sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10278/5124668
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact