After several years, a constitutional litigation initiated by an individual member of Parliament has returned to the Court. The dispute, directed against a law decree that incorporated a legislative text already at an advanced stage of parliamentary examination — thereby rendering it immediately effective — was declared nadmissible. Notwithstanding the sound nature of the ruling, primarily due to procedural deficiencies in the introductory motion, the issue of violations of the legislative process has forcefully resurfaced, particularly in the absence of a decisive stance by the Court.
A volte ritornano: il conflitto parlamentare contro il "Decreto sicurezza" dichiarato inammissibile
Alessandro Lauro
2025
Abstract
After several years, a constitutional litigation initiated by an individual member of Parliament has returned to the Court. The dispute, directed against a law decree that incorporated a legislative text already at an advanced stage of parliamentary examination — thereby rendering it immediately effective — was declared nadmissible. Notwithstanding the sound nature of the ruling, primarily due to procedural deficiencies in the introductory motion, the issue of violations of the legislative process has forcefully resurfaced, particularly in the absence of a decisive stance by the Court.File in questo prodotto:
| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Conflitto_Magi_2025.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Versione dell'editore
Licenza:
Accesso gratuito (solo visione)
Dimensione
329.1 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
329.1 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in ARCA sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.



