Judgment No. 211 of 2025, upholding established case law, reaffirms the unconstitutionality of a provincial law from Trento that introduced the possibility of a third consecutive term for a President elected by universal suffrage. This represents a crucial opportunity to reflect on the national form of state and local forms of government; notably, the Court appears to adopt an approach partially different from the one employed when the simul simul principle was first being tested.

Il divieto del terzo mandato fa il bis: un’occasione per ridiscutere la forma di governo regionale

Alessandro Lauro
2025

Abstract

Judgment No. 211 of 2025, upholding established case law, reaffirms the unconstitutionality of a provincial law from Trento that introduced the possibility of a third consecutive term for a President elected by universal suffrage. This represents a crucial opportunity to reflect on the national form of state and local forms of government; notably, the Court appears to adopt an approach partially different from the one employed when the simul simul principle was first being tested.
2025
LXX
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Terzo_mandato_Trentino.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione dell'editore
Licenza: Accesso gratuito (solo visione)
Dimensione 421.36 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
421.36 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in ARCA sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10278/5122308
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact