Judgment No. 211 of 2025, upholding established case law, reaffirms the unconstitutionality of a provincial law from Trento that introduced the possibility of a third consecutive term for a President elected by universal suffrage. This represents a crucial opportunity to reflect on the national form of state and local forms of government; notably, the Court appears to adopt an approach partially different from the one employed when the simul simul principle was first being tested.
Il divieto del terzo mandato fa il bis: un’occasione per ridiscutere la forma di governo regionale
Alessandro Lauro
2025
Abstract
Judgment No. 211 of 2025, upholding established case law, reaffirms the unconstitutionality of a provincial law from Trento that introduced the possibility of a third consecutive term for a President elected by universal suffrage. This represents a crucial opportunity to reflect on the national form of state and local forms of government; notably, the Court appears to adopt an approach partially different from the one employed when the simul simul principle was first being tested.File in questo prodotto:
| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Terzo_mandato_Trentino.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Versione dell'editore
Licenza:
Accesso gratuito (solo visione)
Dimensione
421.36 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
421.36 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in ARCA sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.



