Judgment no. 134 of 2025, departing from previous case law, establishes that regional laws may identify areas deemed unsuitable for the construction of renewable energy production facilities. However, the Court declares unconstitutional the provision enacted by the Calabria Region that required the sole biomass power plant operating within the Pollino National Park to reduce its output. The decision provides an opportunity to reflect on the normative implications of Articles 9 and 41, as amended in 2022, and allows for an examination of how the Court sought to limit the potential consequences of the Constitution’s ecological turn.

Not in my backyard: la "sensibilità ecologica" delle Regioni nella gabbia delle competenze

Alessandro Lauro
2025

Abstract

Judgment no. 134 of 2025, departing from previous case law, establishes that regional laws may identify areas deemed unsuitable for the construction of renewable energy production facilities. However, the Court declares unconstitutional the provision enacted by the Calabria Region that required the sole biomass power plant operating within the Pollino National Park to reduce its output. The decision provides an opportunity to reflect on the normative implications of Articles 9 and 41, as amended in 2022, and allows for an examination of how the Court sought to limit the potential consequences of the Constitution’s ecological turn.
2025
6
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Sent_134_2025_calabria.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione dell'editore
Licenza: Accesso gratuito (solo visione)
Dimensione 269.37 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
269.37 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in ARCA sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10278/5114150
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact