In this paper I will argue that Niko Kolodny, in The Pecking Order: Social Hierarchy as a Philosophical Problem, provides necessary but not sufficient theoretical tools to distinguish between legitimate and objectionable relationships of hierarchy, due to the tacit individualistic anthropological assumptions underlying his approach. I will therefore highlight the unilaterality of an individualistic anthropological paradigm and emphasize the need for a relational account of human subjectivity in order to further problematize the nature and the persistence of oppressive relationships of social hierarchy.
Anthropologies of Social Life and The Critique of Relations of Inferiority
Francesca Sofia Alexandratos
2025
Abstract
In this paper I will argue that Niko Kolodny, in The Pecking Order: Social Hierarchy as a Philosophical Problem, provides necessary but not sufficient theoretical tools to distinguish between legitimate and objectionable relationships of hierarchy, due to the tacit individualistic anthropological assumptions underlying his approach. I will therefore highlight the unilaterality of an individualistic anthropological paradigm and emphasize the need for a relational account of human subjectivity in order to further problematize the nature and the persistence of oppressive relationships of social hierarchy.File in questo prodotto:
| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
1.Anthropologis+of+Social+Life+and+The+Critique+of+Relations+of+Inferiority-2.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Versione dell'editore
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
387.01 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
387.01 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in ARCA sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.



