In this paper I will argue that Niko Kolodny, in The Pecking Order: Social Hierarchy as a Philosophical Problem, provides necessary but not sufficient theoretical tools to distinguish between legitimate and objectionable relationships of hierarchy, due to the tacit individualistic anthropological assumptions underlying his approach. I will therefore highlight the unilaterality of an individualistic anthropological paradigm and emphasize the need for a relational account of human subjectivity in order to further problematize the nature and the persistence of oppressive relationships of social hierarchy.

Anthropologies of Social Life and The Critique of Relations of Inferiority

Francesca Sofia Alexandratos
2025

Abstract

In this paper I will argue that Niko Kolodny, in The Pecking Order: Social Hierarchy as a Philosophical Problem, provides necessary but not sufficient theoretical tools to distinguish between legitimate and objectionable relationships of hierarchy, due to the tacit individualistic anthropological assumptions underlying his approach. I will therefore highlight the unilaterality of an individualistic anthropological paradigm and emphasize the need for a relational account of human subjectivity in order to further problematize the nature and the persistence of oppressive relationships of social hierarchy.
2025
8
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
1.Anthropologis+of+Social+Life+and+The+Critique+of+Relations+of+Inferiority-2.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione dell'editore
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 387.01 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
387.01 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in ARCA sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10278/5109330
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact