The article studies the reception of the Beveridge Report in Italy between 1943 and 1946. It dwells on the Allied transnational debate on social security and on the ideas outlined in the 1942 Beveridge Report. It then analyses the scope and limits of this influence over the reform proj­ects drafted by the 1944-45 post-fascist governments and over the technical-political debate prior to the 1947 Commissione per la riforma della Previdenza sociale, charged with formulating proposals for social insurance reform. The article argues that occupational-corporatist policy legacies, limited financial capacities and resistance of politics and of social insurance technocracies hampered the shift towards social security along Beveridge’s lines.

Quale «sicurezza sociale»? Il Rapporto Beveridge nei progetti di riforma e nel dibattito italiano (1943-46)

Michele Mioni
2021-01-01

Abstract

The article studies the reception of the Beveridge Report in Italy between 1943 and 1946. It dwells on the Allied transnational debate on social security and on the ideas outlined in the 1942 Beveridge Report. It then analyses the scope and limits of this influence over the reform proj­ects drafted by the 1944-45 post-fascist governments and over the technical-political debate prior to the 1947 Commissione per la riforma della Previdenza sociale, charged with formulating proposals for social insurance reform. The article argues that occupational-corporatist policy legacies, limited financial capacities and resistance of politics and of social insurance technocracies hampered the shift towards social security along Beveridge’s lines.
2021
29
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Mioni_Memoria & Ricerca_2021.pdf

non disponibili

Tipologia: Versione dell'editore
Licenza: Accesso chiuso-personale
Dimensione 165.61 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
165.61 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in ARCA sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10278/5067825
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact