S1a - Advances in analytical environmental electrochemistry S01A-008 Surface Modification with Prussian Blue to Screen-Printed Electrodes for Sodium Detection in Soil Extracts Erika Bustos (Science, CIDETEQ, Pedro Escobedo, Mexico), Victor Julian Gonzalez-Nava, Sara Solis-Valdez, Selene Sepulveda-Guzman, Juan Manriquez, Angela Maria Stortini.

Surface Modification with Prussian Blue to Screen-Printed Electrodes for Sodium Detection in Soil Extracts Erika Bustos1, Víctor Julián González-Nava1, Sara Solís-Valdéz2, Selene Sepúlveda-Guzmán3, Juan Manríquez1, Angela Stortini4 1Centro de Investigación y Desarrollo Tecnológico en Electroquímica, S. C. Parque Tecnológico Querétaro s/n, San Fandila, Pedro Escobedo, 76703, Querétaro, México. 2Geoscience Center, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Campus Juriquilla, Blvd. Juriquilla 3001, Querétaro, 76230, México. 3Faculty of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Ciudad Universitaria, Pedro de Alba s/n, San Nicolás de los Garza, Nuevo León, 66455, México. 4Department of Molecular Sciences and Nanosystems, Ca’Foscari University, Dorsoduro 3246, 30123 Venice, Italy. ebustos@cideteq.mx Screen-printed Carbon electrodes with Carbon Nanotubes (CCNT) with and without modification with Prussian blue (PB) have been evaluated to detect sodium in solution; in addition, the importance of studying these electrodes to carry out field tests in the future without leaving aside its simple synthesis and at the same time affordable for the detection of sodium in soils. The presence of salts affects the assimilation of nutrients by plants and microbial activity [1]. Soil salinization and sodification are critical soil degradation processes that threaten ecosystems and are recognized as one of the most essential problems globally for agricultural production, food security and sustainability in arid and semi-arid regions. When Na+ is the determining cation, the dispersion of the clays occurs, which leads to the destruction of the structures, in addition to causing a dispersion of the soil colloids, which makes it much less permeable [1]. Conducting the electrochemical study and characterization of the deposits was necessary to understand their interaction, stability in solution, and the reliability of the readings from actual soil extract samples, in addition to the use of cyclic voltammetry and amperometry techniques for the construction of sodium calibration curves for subsequent analysis. Nanostructured compounds of PB as electrocatalyst over CCNT can be applied as electrochemical detectors, which is a cubic coordination complex centered on its faces, generating empty spaces through which ionic chemical species can melt, transferring charge between the Fe3+ and Fe2+ ions through cyanide that binds them (-C≡N-) [2-4]. The sodium in actual samples of aqueous soil extract was measured using the calibration curve (current density as a function of sodium concentration). The areas found were 5.77 x 10-5 cm2, 9.02 x 10-5 cm2, and 8.80 x 10-5 cm2 for C, CCNT, and CCNT-PB, respectively. The electroactive area of the electrodes is essential for their modification; PB was electrodeposited between the CNTs and/or on them, so the electroactive area found in this type of electrodes (CCNT-PB) is slightly less than the CCNT electrodes. However, despite having a smaller area, the deposit helped obtain a better signal in detecting sodium than simply having CNT on the surface of the electrode. The results obtained using the CCNT-PB electrode for detecting Na+ in the natural soil extract samples were 2.80 and 3.64. 2.45, 4.01, 3.30, and 3.45 cmol/Kg soil. Additionally, the C, CCNT, and CCNT-PB surfaces were characterized by XRD, SEM-EDS, and Raman spectroscopy, showing the presence of PB as cubic shapes around the CNT, which is the electrocatalyst to promote the best detection and quantification limit of sodium in aqueous media for this research. REFERENCES [1] Piedra L. A., Cepero G. C. C.M, (2013), Cultrop vol.34 no.4 La Habana, ISSN 0258-5936. [2] B. T. T. Nguyen, J. Q. Ang and C. S. Toh, (2009). Electrochemistry Communications, 11, 1861. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.elecom.2009.08.003 [3] R. Yang, (1998). J. Electrochem. Soc., 145, 2231. 10.1149/1.1838625 [4] S. Husmann, S. G. Booth, A. J. G. Zarbin and R. A. W. Dryfe, (2018), J. Braz. Chem. Soc., 29, 1130. http://dx.doi.org/10.21577/0103-5053.20180024