That peculiar form of paraconsistent logic which is dialetheism intends to support the existence, in particular circumstances, of ‘true contradictions’, that is to say situations in which the principle of non-contradiction is both valid and invalid. The paper takes into consideration a thesis that, starting from the dialeteistic position and the concept of ‘non-exclusive negation’, believes the defense of the principle of non-contradiction a petitio principii. Once shown the li- mits of a certain interpretation concerning Ritornare a Parmenide’s sixth paragraph, dedicated to the aristotelian élenchos, here are the reasons why even the dialetheistic denial, just to be that meaning which actually is, it is annulled as negation and homologated to the affirmation of the principle.
Élenchos, o il destino del pensiero
Francesco Saccardi
2019-01-01
Abstract
That peculiar form of paraconsistent logic which is dialetheism intends to support the existence, in particular circumstances, of ‘true contradictions’, that is to say situations in which the principle of non-contradiction is both valid and invalid. The paper takes into consideration a thesis that, starting from the dialeteistic position and the concept of ‘non-exclusive negation’, believes the defense of the principle of non-contradiction a petitio principii. Once shown the li- mits of a certain interpretation concerning Ritornare a Parmenide’s sixth paragraph, dedicated to the aristotelian élenchos, here are the reasons why even the dialetheistic denial, just to be that meaning which actually is, it is annulled as negation and homologated to the affirmation of the principle.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
11) Saccardi_Elenchos, o il destino del pensiero.pdf
non disponibili
Tipologia:
Versione dell'editore
Licenza:
Accesso chiuso-personale
Dimensione
367.47 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
367.47 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in ARCA sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.