This is a critical response to the "Commentary" by Daniel Fleming, Georgina Herrmann, Marina Pucci and Valerie Matoian (JNES 80/2:401-406), attached as a discussion forum to the article "Urban Squares in Late Bronze Age Ugarit". The response addresses in particular three debated questions concerning the Syrian city of Ugarit at the end of the Late Bronze Age: the economic and social differences within Ugarit’s urban population (moderate); the long-term existence and changing political meaning of urban squares - including their relationship to the political discourse of Ugarit’s ruling elite in the 13th century; and the possibility that squares may have had multiple functions (it was likely so).
Author Response [to "Commentary" by Daniel E. Fleming, Virginia R. Herrmann, Marina Pucci and Valérie Matoïan, JNES 80/2:401-406]
Alessandra Gilibert
2021-01-01
Abstract
This is a critical response to the "Commentary" by Daniel Fleming, Georgina Herrmann, Marina Pucci and Valerie Matoian (JNES 80/2:401-406), attached as a discussion forum to the article "Urban Squares in Late Bronze Age Ugarit". The response addresses in particular three debated questions concerning the Syrian city of Ugarit at the end of the Late Bronze Age: the economic and social differences within Ugarit’s urban population (moderate); the long-term existence and changing political meaning of urban squares - including their relationship to the political discourse of Ugarit’s ruling elite in the 13th century; and the possibility that squares may have had multiple functions (it was likely so).File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
JNES_Author response.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Versione dell'editore
Licenza:
Accesso gratuito (solo visione)
Dimensione
1.44 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.44 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in ARCA sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.