This paper intends to examine the meaning that the concept of “history of philosophy” assumes within the philosophy of Emanuele Severino. If the idealistic identity of philosophy and history of philosophy has already progressively undergone a process of de-legitimization up to the total negation of the theoretical nature of philosophical historiography in the extrinsic historical-philological purpose, this is now to understand if, and in what ways, it is possible to rediscover, in light of the ‘primal structure’ indicated by the Severinian writings, the development of philosophy as actuality.

The primal judgement and the unity-multiplicity of the categories

Mattia Cardenas
2020-01-01

Abstract

This paper intends to examine the meaning that the concept of “history of philosophy” assumes within the philosophy of Emanuele Severino. If the idealistic identity of philosophy and history of philosophy has already progressively undergone a process of de-legitimization up to the total negation of the theoretical nature of philosophical historiography in the extrinsic historical-philological purpose, this is now to understand if, and in what ways, it is possible to rediscover, in light of the ‘primal structure’ indicated by the Severinian writings, the development of philosophy as actuality.
2020
2
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
M. Cardenas, The primal judgement and the unity-multiplicity (E&C).pdf

non disponibili

Tipologia: Versione dell'editore
Licenza: Accesso chiuso-personale
Dimensione 433.37 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
433.37 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in ARCA sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10278/5021104
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact