With the decision hereby analysed, the Supreme Court enters the complex remedial apparatus of the antitrust enforcement, thus asserting the partial invalidity of the omnibus surety contracts concluded by the banks who act “downstream” of an anti-competitive agreement. The Court, through the search for a balance between the (potentially) opposing instances of deterrence, contract conservation and weaker contractor protection, retraced with this paper, gives a new twist to the well-known and kaleidoscopic affair that began in the aftermath of the Bank of Italy’s provision of 2 May 2005.
Le fideiussioni omnibus “a valle” di un’intesa antitrust al vaglio delle Sezioni Unite. L’esigenza di porre un ordine agli obiettivi perseguiti.
Costanza Morato
In corso di stampa
Abstract
With the decision hereby analysed, the Supreme Court enters the complex remedial apparatus of the antitrust enforcement, thus asserting the partial invalidity of the omnibus surety contracts concluded by the banks who act “downstream” of an anti-competitive agreement. The Court, through the search for a balance between the (potentially) opposing instances of deterrence, contract conservation and weaker contractor protection, retraced with this paper, gives a new twist to the well-known and kaleidoscopic affair that began in the aftermath of the Bank of Italy’s provision of 2 May 2005.File in questo prodotto:
File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Le fideiussioni omnibus “a valle” di un’intesa antitrust al vaglio delle Sezioni Unite. L’esigenza di porre un ordine agli obiettivi perseguiti. - C. Morato.pdf
non disponibili
Tipologia:
Documento in Pre-print
Licenza:
Accesso chiuso-personale
Dimensione
759.17 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
759.17 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in ARCA sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.