For the condemnation of compensation for damages, for the exercise of conduct of unfair competition, reference must be made to the general conditions expressly sanctioned by art. 2043 of the civil code Therefore, in addition to the subjective assumption of guilt, the actual damage must exist - differently from what is necessary for the injunction - and the causal link between the unlawful behavior and the harmful event. The presumption iuris tantum, in relation to fault, expressly sanctioned by paragraph 3 of article 2600 of the Civil Code, which appears to be the only feature characterizing the distinction with the tort, is justified on the basis of the ''privileged'' regime granted from the legislator to the victim of torts in the field of competition.
Risarcimento del danno, Commento sub art. 2600
VITO BEVIVINO
2012-01-01
Abstract
For the condemnation of compensation for damages, for the exercise of conduct of unfair competition, reference must be made to the general conditions expressly sanctioned by art. 2043 of the civil code Therefore, in addition to the subjective assumption of guilt, the actual damage must exist - differently from what is necessary for the injunction - and the causal link between the unlawful behavior and the harmful event. The presumption iuris tantum, in relation to fault, expressly sanctioned by paragraph 3 of article 2600 of the Civil Code, which appears to be the only feature characterizing the distinction with the tort, is justified on the basis of the ''privileged'' regime granted from the legislator to the victim of torts in the field of competition.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Bevivino - Bonilini Comm Art 2600 CCComm 2ed 2012.pdf
non disponibili
Descrizione: Commento all'art. 2600 c.c.
Tipologia:
Versione dell'editore
Licenza:
Accesso chiuso-personale
Dimensione
198.74 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
198.74 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in ARCA sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.