Domoic acid (DA) is a neurotoxin produced by different algae, including pennate diatoms, principally from the genus Pseudo-nitzschia, and it is the main cause of amnesic shellfish poisoning. Determination of this toxin in seawater samples is fundamental to define the real contamination risks for aquatic species. We have developed two very sensitive instrumental methods using hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography coupled using tandem mass spectrometry in positive and negative polarity modes. Instrumental detection limits were 9 pg mL−1 for positive and 19 pg mL−1 for negative ionisation. A procedural method based on solidphase extraction for the determination of dissolved DA present in seawater has been developed, and an extraction procedure was employed for the determination of the toxin in the particulate fraction. DA quantification was performed using the internal standard method to account for signals fluctuations and random errors during sample treatment. To our knowledge, this is the first study to use this quantification method for DA determination. Trueness, extraction yield, matrix effects, repeatability and procedural detection limits were evaluated during method validation. Procedural detection limits of 0.3 pg mL−1 (positive mode) and 0.6 pg mL−1 (negative mode) were found for the dissolved fraction, and absolute limits of 0.4 pg (positive mode) and 6.0 pg (negative mode) for particulate samples were obtained. The most sensitive method in positive mode was applied to define DA occurrence in the Venice Lagoon. Trace concentrations of domoic acid ranging from 1.5 to 16.2 pg mL−1 were found for the first time in the Venetian environment.

Domoic acid (DA) is a neurotoxin produced by different algae, including pennate diatoms, principally from the genus Pseudo-nitzschia, and it is the main cause of amnesic shellfish poisoning. Determination of this toxin in seawater samples is fundamental to define the real contamination risks for aquatic species. We have developed two very sensitive instrumental methods using hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography coupled using tandem mass spectrometry in positive and negative polarity modes. Instrumental detection limits were 9 pg mL-1 for positive and 19 pg mL-1 for negative ionisation. A procedural method based on solid-phase extraction for the determination of dissolved DA present in seawater has been developed, and an extraction procedure was employed for the determination of the toxin in the particulate fraction. DA quantification was performed using the internal standard method to account for signals fluctuations and random errors during sample treatment. To our knowledge, this is the first study to use this quantification method for DA determination. Trueness, extraction yield, matrix effects, repeatability and procedural detection limits were evaluated during method validation. Procedural detection limits of 0.3 pg mL-1 (positive mode) and 0.6 pg mL-1 (negative mode) were found for the dissolved fraction, and absolute limits of 0.4 pg (positive mode) and 6.0 pg (negative mode) for particulate samples were obtained. The most sensitive method in positive mode was applied to define DA occurrence in the Venice Lagoon. Trace concentrations of domoic acid ranging from 1.5 to 16.2 pg mL-1 were found for the first time in the Venetian environment. [Figure not available: see fulltext.] © 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.

Domoic acid at trace levels in lagoon waters: assessment of a method using internal standard quantification

PIAZZA, Rossano;BARBANTE, Carlo;GAMBARO, Andrea
2013-01-01

Abstract

Domoic acid (DA) is a neurotoxin produced by different algae, including pennate diatoms, principally from the genus Pseudo-nitzschia, and it is the main cause of amnesic shellfish poisoning. Determination of this toxin in seawater samples is fundamental to define the real contamination risks for aquatic species. We have developed two very sensitive instrumental methods using hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography coupled using tandem mass spectrometry in positive and negative polarity modes. Instrumental detection limits were 9 pg mL-1 for positive and 19 pg mL-1 for negative ionisation. A procedural method based on solid-phase extraction for the determination of dissolved DA present in seawater has been developed, and an extraction procedure was employed for the determination of the toxin in the particulate fraction. DA quantification was performed using the internal standard method to account for signals fluctuations and random errors during sample treatment. To our knowledge, this is the first study to use this quantification method for DA determination. Trueness, extraction yield, matrix effects, repeatability and procedural detection limits were evaluated during method validation. Procedural detection limits of 0.3 pg mL-1 (positive mode) and 0.6 pg mL-1 (negative mode) were found for the dissolved fraction, and absolute limits of 0.4 pg (positive mode) and 6.0 pg (negative mode) for particulate samples were obtained. The most sensitive method in positive mode was applied to define DA occurrence in the Venice Lagoon. Trace concentrations of domoic acid ranging from 1.5 to 16.2 pg mL-1 were found for the first time in the Venetian environment. [Figure not available: see fulltext.] © 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
ABC 2013.pdf

non disponibili

Tipologia: Documento in Post-print
Licenza: Accesso chiuso-personale
Dimensione 353.48 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
353.48 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri
barbaro_ABC submission.doc

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Documento in Pre-print
Licenza: Accesso gratuito (solo visione)
Dimensione 202.5 kB
Formato Microsoft Word
202.5 kB Microsoft Word Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in ARCA sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10278/38439
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 18
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 16
social impact