In the spin model of a helix-coil transition in polypeptides a preferred value of spin has to be assigned to the helical conformation, in order to account for different symmetries of the helical {\sl vs.} the coil states, leading thus to the {\sl Generalized Model of Polypeptide Chain} (GMPC) Hamiltonian as opposed to the Potts model Hamiltonian, both with many-body interactions. Comparison of explicit transfer-matrix secular equations of the Potts model and the GMPC model reveals that the largest eigenvalue of the Potts model with $\Delta$ many-body interactions {\sl coincides} with the largest eigenvalue of the GMPC model with $\Delta-1$ many-body interactions, indicating the identity of both free energies. In distinction, the second largest eigenvalues in both models do {\sl not coincide}, indicating a different behavior for the spatial correlation length that in its turn defines the width of the helix-coil transition interval. We explore in detail the thermodynamic consequences, resulting from spin models with and without the built-in spin anisotropy, that should indicate which model to favour as a more appropriate description of the equilibrium physical properties pertaining to the helix-coil transition

Helix-coil transition in terms of Potts-like spins

GIACOMETTI, Achille;
2013-01-01

Abstract

In the spin model of a helix-coil transition in polypeptides a preferred value of spin has to be assigned to the helical conformation, in order to account for different symmetries of the helical {\sl vs.} the coil states, leading thus to the {\sl Generalized Model of Polypeptide Chain} (GMPC) Hamiltonian as opposed to the Potts model Hamiltonian, both with many-body interactions. Comparison of explicit transfer-matrix secular equations of the Potts model and the GMPC model reveals that the largest eigenvalue of the Potts model with $\Delta$ many-body interactions {\sl coincides} with the largest eigenvalue of the GMPC model with $\Delta-1$ many-body interactions, indicating the identity of both free energies. In distinction, the second largest eigenvalues in both models do {\sl not coincide}, indicating a different behavior for the spatial correlation length that in its turn defines the width of the helix-coil transition interval. We explore in detail the thermodynamic consequences, resulting from spin models with and without the built-in spin anisotropy, that should indicate which model to favour as a more appropriate description of the equilibrium physical properties pertaining to the helix-coil transition
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Badasyan_EPJE_13.pdf

non disponibili

Tipologia: Documento in Post-print
Licenza: Accesso chiuso-personale
Dimensione 681.36 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
681.36 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in ARCA sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10278/37632
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 6
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 6
social impact