While Descartes criticized the scholastic system of learning based on books and erudition, he proposed a new way of achieving knowledge through the force of the reason alone. However, this did not develop into an utter refusal of books in themselves, but only of their erroneous and sterile use. The essay aims to sketch (1.) Descartes' attention and interest in books as objects of scientia within his correspondence, (2.) Descartes' definition of a proper use of books (and therefore of a 'legitimate' kind of books), (3.) Descartes' philosophical systematization of both reading and writing under the order of reason. Rhetoric, thus, develops as subject and instrument of reasoning, as well as books and (philosophical) literature.

Ineffective books, compendiums and 'primary' books. Descartes between reading and writing philosophy

Baldassarri F.
2016-01-01

Abstract

While Descartes criticized the scholastic system of learning based on books and erudition, he proposed a new way of achieving knowledge through the force of the reason alone. However, this did not develop into an utter refusal of books in themselves, but only of their erroneous and sterile use. The essay aims to sketch (1.) Descartes' attention and interest in books as objects of scientia within his correspondence, (2.) Descartes' definition of a proper use of books (and therefore of a 'legitimate' kind of books), (3.) Descartes' philosophical systematization of both reading and writing under the order of reason. Rhetoric, thus, develops as subject and instrument of reasoning, as well as books and (philosophical) literature.
2016
95
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
BALDASSARRI_GCFI 2-3_2016.pdf

non disponibili

Tipologia: Documento in Post-print
Licenza: Accesso chiuso-personale
Dimensione 356.21 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
356.21 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in ARCA sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10278/3751854
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 2
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact