In this paper, we present a model of implementation where infeasible allocations are converted into feasible ones through a process of renegotiation that is represented by a reversion function. We describe the maximal set of Social Choice Correspondences that can be implemented in Nash Equilibrium in a class of reversion functions that punish agents for infeasibilities. This is used to study the implementation of the Walrasian Correspondence and several axiomatic solutions to problems of bargaining and taxation.
Implementation with renegotiation when preferences and feasible sets are state dependent
Triossi M.
2011-01-01
Abstract
In this paper, we present a model of implementation where infeasible allocations are converted into feasible ones through a process of renegotiation that is represented by a reversion function. We describe the maximal set of Social Choice Correspondences that can be implemented in Nash Equilibrium in a class of reversion functions that punish agents for infeasibilities. This is used to study the implementation of the Walrasian Correspondence and several axiomatic solutions to problems of bargaining and taxation.File in questo prodotto:
File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Finalfeasy.pdf
non disponibili
Tipologia:
Documento in Post-print
Licenza:
Accesso chiuso-personale
Dimensione
338.45 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
338.45 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in ARCA sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.