Not much of the editorial process of creating digital scholarly editions is automated or assisted by computer tools. Existing tools are hard to combine in a coherent workflow. This paper discusses several challenges of collaborative editorial projects dealing with many manuscript witnesses and proposes the adoption of a shared formalization describing the editorial process. The use of a shared formalization will allow the whole editorial process to be semi-automated, with positive repercussions on the workload of the editors and on the quality and verifiability of the edition itself.
The Formalization of Textual Criticism: Bridging the Gap Between Automated Collation and Edited Critical Texts
Franz Fischer
2017-01-01
Abstract
Not much of the editorial process of creating digital scholarly editions is automated or assisted by computer tools. Existing tools are hard to combine in a coherent workflow. This paper discusses several challenges of collaborative editorial projects dealing with many manuscript witnesses and proposes the adoption of a shared formalization describing the editorial process. The use of a shared formalization will allow the whole editorial process to be semi-automated, with positive repercussions on the workload of the editors and on the quality and verifiability of the edition itself.File in questo prodotto:
File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Advances_in_Digital_Scholary_Editing_2017-Fischer.pdf
accesso aperto
Descrizione: Introduzione e articolo principale
Tipologia:
Versione dell'editore
Licenza:
Accesso libero (no vincoli)
Dimensione
325.7 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
325.7 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in ARCA sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.