In this essay, we will first assess the difference between two types of knowledge usually classified as expert and non-expert, namely scientific and local knowledge. Secondly, we will discuss whether these two types of knowledge are incompatible or complementary. Thirdly, we will argue that, were we to come to believe that they are complementary, a theoretical framework of conditions and practical requirements should be articulated to allow technical information and informal experience suitably to combine. To illustrate our argument we will make use of a case-study (the Vajont disaster) that aptly shows how official science and local experience may confront each other, and why at times they fail to do so.

Filosofia del rischio, conoscenza locale e ruolo degli esperti: un’analisi epistemologica di case study

Eleonora Montuschi
2018-01-01

Abstract

In this essay, we will first assess the difference between two types of knowledge usually classified as expert and non-expert, namely scientific and local knowledge. Secondly, we will discuss whether these two types of knowledge are incompatible or complementary. Thirdly, we will argue that, were we to come to believe that they are complementary, a theoretical framework of conditions and practical requirements should be articulated to allow technical information and informal experience suitably to combine. To illustrate our argument we will make use of a case-study (the Vajont disaster) that aptly shows how official science and local experience may confront each other, and why at times they fail to do so.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Montuschi Barrotta.pdf

non disponibili

Descrizione: articolo principale
Tipologia: Documento in Post-print
Licenza: Accesso chiuso-personale
Dimensione 216.53 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
216.53 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in ARCA sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10278/3699288
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact