The current historiography on Renaissance Averroism stems from Ernest Renan’s 1852 classic Averroès et l’averroïsme. Using a positivistic conception of the natural antagonism between rational science and religion, Renan’s work concentrated on religiously charged debates. Averroes’ influence, however, was far broader. An analysis of the changes in the depiction of followers of Averroes demonstrates that by the end of the sixteenth century Averroists were labelled as such because of their techniques of interpretation and many of their positions were not considered heretical or religiously dangerous.
Rethinking Renaissance Averroism∗
MARTIN, Craig Edwin
2007-01-01
Abstract
The current historiography on Renaissance Averroism stems from Ernest Renan’s 1852 classic Averroès et l’averroïsme. Using a positivistic conception of the natural antagonism between rational science and religion, Renan’s work concentrated on religiously charged debates. Averroes’ influence, however, was far broader. An analysis of the changes in the depiction of followers of Averroes demonstrates that by the end of the sixteenth century Averroists were labelled as such because of their techniques of interpretation and many of their positions were not considered heretical or religiously dangerous.File in questo prodotto:
File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
averroes ihr.pdf
non disponibili
Descrizione: Articolo principale
Tipologia:
Versione dell'editore
Licenza:
Accesso chiuso-personale
Dimensione
81.46 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
81.46 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in ARCA sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.