The goal of this paper is to discuss the cartography of Topic and Focus in Italian left periphery, to show that Topics can occur on either side of Focus, as in Rizzi’s (1997) original proposal. The data provided by Benincà and Poletto (2004) to argue against this possibility are shown to raise both empirical and theoretical questions. Additional evidence is provided to support the view that Foci can be followed by Familiar Topics, as in Frascarelli and Hinterhölzl’s (2007) typology of Topics. The discourse contribution of left- and right-dislocated Familiar Topics is also discussed
SOME NEW OBSERVATIONS ON THE CARTOGRAPHY OF TOPIC AND FOCUS
CARDINALETTI, Anna
2016-01-01
Abstract
The goal of this paper is to discuss the cartography of Topic and Focus in Italian left periphery, to show that Topics can occur on either side of Focus, as in Rizzi’s (1997) original proposal. The data provided by Benincà and Poletto (2004) to argue against this possibility are shown to raise both empirical and theoretical questions. Additional evidence is provided to support the view that Foci can be followed by Familiar Topics, as in Frascarelli and Hinterhölzl’s (2007) typology of Topics. The discourse contribution of left- and right-dislocated Familiar Topics is also discussedFile in questo prodotto:
File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
05. Cardinaletti RGG.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Versione dell'editore
Licenza:
Accesso libero (no vincoli)
Dimensione
425.53 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
425.53 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in ARCA sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.