This paper presents annotation work to manually classify satire/sarcasm in long commentaries on Italian politics. It is based on Appraisal Theory and uses some 30K word texts. The underlying hypothesis is that using this framework it is possible to pinpoint precisely the deep semantic contents of evaluative judgements and appreciations making up an ironic comment. We performed a high level annotation using major categories, and then refined the classification starting from the lexica derived from the xml annotated files. In this way we succeeded in differentiating texts by the two authors we chose, one of which is characterized by a sharp cutting ironic/almost sarcastic style.
Annotating Satire in Italian Political Commentaries with Appraisal Theory
STINGO, MICHELE;DELMONTE, Rodolfo
2016-01-01
Abstract
This paper presents annotation work to manually classify satire/sarcasm in long commentaries on Italian politics. It is based on Appraisal Theory and uses some 30K word texts. The underlying hypothesis is that using this framework it is possible to pinpoint precisely the deep semantic contents of evaluative judgements and appreciations making up an ironic comment. We performed a high level annotation using major categories, and then refined the classification starting from the lexica derived from the xml annotated files. In this way we succeeded in differentiating texts by the two authors we chose, one of which is characterized by a sharp cutting ironic/almost sarcastic style.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Annotating_Satires.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Documento in Post-print
Licenza:
Accesso libero (no vincoli)
Dimensione
151.41 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
151.41 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in ARCA sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.