In §513 of ON CERTAINTY Wittgenstein asks "What if something really unherad-of happened?" But whit this question he is not asking us to make a forecast, a prediction, or some sort of empirico-psychological prophecy about our possible reactions. As I will attempt to show, the question regarding the unheard-of is part of Wittgenstein's philosophical method - which is to say, it is one of the instruments with which he combats what he sees as the principal source of the confusions in philosophy: mistaking the grammatical for the empirical or, as he also says, the conceptual for the factual. In this sense the question regarding the unheard-of can shed some light on the grammatical status of what he calls "hinges".
Miracles, Hinges, and Grammar in Wittgenstein's on Certainty
PERISSINOTTO, Luigi
2016-01-01
Abstract
In §513 of ON CERTAINTY Wittgenstein asks "What if something really unherad-of happened?" But whit this question he is not asking us to make a forecast, a prediction, or some sort of empirico-psychological prophecy about our possible reactions. As I will attempt to show, the question regarding the unheard-of is part of Wittgenstein's philosophical method - which is to say, it is one of the instruments with which he combats what he sees as the principal source of the confusions in philosophy: mistaking the grammatical for the empirical or, as he also says, the conceptual for the factual. In this sense the question regarding the unheard-of can shed some light on the grammatical status of what he calls "hinges".File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
SKEP_006_02-03_Perissinotto.pdf
non disponibili
Descrizione: articolo su rivista
Tipologia:
Versione dell'editore
Licenza:
Accesso chiuso-personale
Dimensione
192.51 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
192.51 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in ARCA sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.