We address the problem of comparing attributed trees and propose four novel distance measures centered around the notion of a maximal similarity common subtree. The proposed measures are general and defined on trees endowed with either symbolic or continuous-valued attributes and can be applied to rooted as well as unrooted trees. We prove that our measures satisfythe metric constraints and provide a polynomial-time algorithm to compute them. This is a remarkable and attractive property, since the computation of traditional edit-distance-based metrics is, in general, NP-complete, at least in the unordered case. We experimentally validate the usefulness of our metrics on shape matching tasks and compare them with (an approximation of) edit-distance.

Polynomial-time metrics for attributed trees

TORSELLO, Andrea;PELILLO, Marcello
2005

Abstract

We address the problem of comparing attributed trees and propose four novel distance measures centered around the notion of a maximal similarity common subtree. The proposed measures are general and defined on trees endowed with either symbolic or continuous-valued attributes and can be applied to rooted as well as unrooted trees. We prove that our measures satisfythe metric constraints and provide a polynomial-time algorithm to compute them. This is a remarkable and attractive property, since the computation of traditional edit-distance-based metrics is, in general, NP-complete, at least in the unordered case. We experimentally validate the usefulness of our metrics on shape matching tasks and compare them with (an approximation of) edit-distance.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
PAMI-tree-metrics(27)2005.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Documento in Post-print
Licenza: Accesso gratuito (solo visione)
Dimensione 1.07 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.07 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in ARCA sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10278/28758
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 61
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 49
social impact