The study conducts an institutional, structured review of 43 official reports from countries and major international organizations (e.g., WHO, OECD, UN) to investigate how gender-related aspects are integrated into the conceptualization of well-being. A first literature background of this concept, very diffused but also very difficult to define in a shared way, highlights a lack of a clear and diffused definition and the presence of similar terms with other meanings, such as wellness, happiness, and quality of life. The analysis of these very recent institutional documents reveals a significant emphasis on gender inequality as a key dimension of horizontal disparities, cited in 29 out of 43 reports. While various well-being indicators and dimensions are identified, with social and community life, health, and work/economy being the most frequent, the analysis of inequality indicators highlights a focus on the gender wage gap, political parity, and total hours worked. Finally, there is a clear lack of attention to gender diversity within entrepreneurship and corporate leadership. The findings underscore a widespread recognition of gender as a crucial factor in well-being at the institutional level yet point to a gap in comprehensively addressing its role in economic drivers like business and management. The study concludes by emphasizing the need for a broader integration of gender diversity across all societal sectors in well-being frameworks, including the management and entrepreneurship world, and suggesting that future research should compare institutional perspectives with academic literature and explore best practices.

Integrating Gender Diversity in Well-Being Policies: A Review of Institutional Literature

Cavazza, Alberto;Dal Mas, Francesca
;
Bertarelli, Gaia;Campostrini, Stefano
2026

Abstract

The study conducts an institutional, structured review of 43 official reports from countries and major international organizations (e.g., WHO, OECD, UN) to investigate how gender-related aspects are integrated into the conceptualization of well-being. A first literature background of this concept, very diffused but also very difficult to define in a shared way, highlights a lack of a clear and diffused definition and the presence of similar terms with other meanings, such as wellness, happiness, and quality of life. The analysis of these very recent institutional documents reveals a significant emphasis on gender inequality as a key dimension of horizontal disparities, cited in 29 out of 43 reports. While various well-being indicators and dimensions are identified, with social and community life, health, and work/economy being the most frequent, the analysis of inequality indicators highlights a focus on the gender wage gap, political parity, and total hours worked. Finally, there is a clear lack of attention to gender diversity within entrepreneurship and corporate leadership. The findings underscore a widespread recognition of gender as a crucial factor in well-being at the institutional level yet point to a gap in comprehensively addressing its role in economic drivers like business and management. The study concludes by emphasizing the need for a broader integration of gender diversity across all societal sectors in well-being frameworks, including the management and entrepreneurship world, and suggesting that future research should compare institutional perspectives with academic literature and explore best practices.
2026
Art, Culture and Made in Italy. Gender Perspectives in the Contemporary World.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
CavazzaDalMasBertarelliCampostriniReviewGender2026.pdf

non disponibili

Tipologia: Documento in Post-print
Licenza: Accesso chiuso-personale
Dimensione 1.17 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.17 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in ARCA sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10278/5112328
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact