This essay summarizes the debate surrounding Matti Häyry's proposal for a non-confrontational rationality in bioethics. After critically analyzing and summarizing all the positions presented in the debate, the author argues that non-confrontational rationality must always be the first step in the bioethical method, which, however, cannot ignore a secondary confrontational aspect. Both the confrontational and non-confrontational aspects, on their own, risk becoming pathological.
A non confrontational notion of rationality. In search of a method for bioethics
Fabrizio Turoldo
In corso di stampa
Abstract
This essay summarizes the debate surrounding Matti Häyry's proposal for a non-confrontational rationality in bioethics. After critically analyzing and summarizing all the positions presented in the debate, the author argues that non-confrontational rationality must always be the first step in the bioethical method, which, however, cannot ignore a secondary confrontational aspect. Both the confrontational and non-confrontational aspects, on their own, risk becoming pathological.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
I documenti in ARCA sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
