This essay summarizes the debate surrounding Matti Häyry's proposal for a non-confrontational rationality in bioethics. After critically analyzing and summarizing all the positions presented in the debate, the author argues that non-confrontational rationality must always be the first step in the bioethical method, which, however, cannot ignore a secondary confrontational aspect. Both the confrontational and non-confrontational aspects, on their own, risk becoming pathological.
A non confrontational notion of rationality. In search of a method for bioethics
Fabrizio Turoldo
2026
Abstract
This essay summarizes the debate surrounding Matti Häyry's proposal for a non-confrontational rationality in bioethics. After critically analyzing and summarizing all the positions presented in the debate, the author argues that non-confrontational rationality must always be the first step in the bioethical method, which, however, cannot ignore a secondary confrontational aspect. Both the confrontational and non-confrontational aspects, on their own, risk becoming pathological.
File in questo prodotto:
| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
A non confrontational notion of rationality.pdf
non disponibili
Descrizione: A non confrontational notion of rationality
Tipologia:
Documento in Pre-print
Licenza:
Accesso chiuso-personale
Dimensione
675.12 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
675.12 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in ARCA sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
