Aristotle does not oppose causal determinism, which in his time had not yet been formulated; he discusses the question whether the evil acts voluntarily. His two most important moves are to put good and evil action on similar footing, stating that both depend on us, and not one does and the other does not and to indicate this, to adapt to the analysis of human action a phrase from common language, eph’hêmin , to indicate that man is the master of his actions

Aristotle's Causes and the Problem of the Necessity of our Actions.

Carlo Natali
2024-01-01

Abstract

Aristotle does not oppose causal determinism, which in his time had not yet been formulated; he discusses the question whether the evil acts voluntarily. His two most important moves are to put good and evil action on similar footing, stating that both depend on us, and not one does and the other does not and to indicate this, to adapt to the analysis of human action a phrase from common language, eph’hêmin , to indicate that man is the master of his actions
2024
Cause and Explanation in Ancient Philosophy
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Causes and necessity of action.pdf

non disponibili

Tipologia: Documento in Pre-print
Licenza: Accesso chiuso-personale
Dimensione 667.47 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
667.47 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in ARCA sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10278/5046521
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact