After 8 years since the enactment of the Single Resolution Mechanism (SRM), resolution has proved to be largely unenforceable: only the Banco Popular and, most recently, Sberbank Europe AG have entered into resolution. In fact, the standardisation of the EU crisis management and deposit insurance framework (CMDI)—tailored on large universal banks—has led resolution authorities (RAs) to provide a strict interpretation of the public interest (PIA). In essence, it seems there are several grounds for non-compliance between the existing framework and the fundamental principle of proportionality. The article seeks to provide a first analysis in that respect.
Il principio di proporzionalità nell’ambito del SRM: la prospettiva italiana
Iacopo Donati
;Lorenzo Stanghellini
2022-01-01
Abstract
After 8 years since the enactment of the Single Resolution Mechanism (SRM), resolution has proved to be largely unenforceable: only the Banco Popular and, most recently, Sberbank Europe AG have entered into resolution. In fact, the standardisation of the EU crisis management and deposit insurance framework (CMDI)—tailored on large universal banks—has led resolution authorities (RAs) to provide a strict interpretation of the public interest (PIA). In essence, it seems there are several grounds for non-compliance between the existing framework and the fundamental principle of proportionality. The article seeks to provide a first analysis in that respect.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Donati_Stanghellini, Il principio di proporzionalità nell’ambito del SRM_la prospettiva italiana (per estratto).pdf
non disponibili
Tipologia:
Versione dell'editore
Licenza:
Accesso chiuso-personale
Dimensione
274.27 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
274.27 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in ARCA sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.