The aim of this article is to examine Duns Scotus’ account of divine omnipotence. I shall firstly consider his doctrine of the objective possible and the distinction between logical potency and metaphysical potency. Secondly, by drawing on Scotus’ main texts on divine omnipotence (especially the Quodlibet VII), I will argue that, in his view, God’s omnipotence is not demonstrable, but at the same time is not an irrational concept, as Aristotle and many Medieval philosophi claimed. Finally, I shall discuss the connection between Scotus’ theory of being and that of the superiority of the will over the intellect.
Essere è volere. Il problema dell'onnipotenza in Duns Scoto
Gian Pietro Soliani
2019-01-01
Abstract
The aim of this article is to examine Duns Scotus’ account of divine omnipotence. I shall firstly consider his doctrine of the objective possible and the distinction between logical potency and metaphysical potency. Secondly, by drawing on Scotus’ main texts on divine omnipotence (especially the Quodlibet VII), I will argue that, in his view, God’s omnipotence is not demonstrable, but at the same time is not an irrational concept, as Aristotle and many Medieval philosophi claimed. Finally, I shall discuss the connection between Scotus’ theory of being and that of the superiority of the will over the intellect.File in questo prodotto:
File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Essere è volere Il problema dell'onnipotenza in Duns Scoto_Soliani.pdf
accesso aperto
Descrizione: Articolo
Tipologia:
Versione dell'editore
Licenza:
Accesso libero (no vincoli)
Dimensione
839.26 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
839.26 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in ARCA sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.