In the standard Krugman (1979) non-CES trade model, several asymmetric countries typically lose from increasing trade costs. However, all countries transiently benefit from such increase at the moment of closing trade, under almost-prohibitive trade costs (i.e., near autarky, which is possible only under non-CES preferences). In other words, during trade liberalization the first step from autarky to trade is necessarily harmful. Our explanation rests on market distortion and business destruction effects.
Painful Birth of Trade Under Classical Monopolistic Competition
BYKADOROV, Igor;ELLERO, Andrea;FUNARI, Stefania;
2016-01-01
Abstract
In the standard Krugman (1979) non-CES trade model, several asymmetric countries typically lose from increasing trade costs. However, all countries transiently benefit from such increase at the moment of closing trade, under almost-prohibitive trade costs (i.e., near autarky, which is possible only under non-CES preferences). In other words, during trade liberalization the first step from autarky to trade is necessarily harmful. Our explanation rests on market distortion and business destruction effects.File in questo prodotto:
File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
SSRN-id2759872.pdf
accesso aperto
Descrizione: ARTICOLO
Tipologia:
Documento in Post-print
Licenza:
Accesso libero (no vincoli)
Dimensione
1.25 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.25 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in ARCA sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.