Karamanlidika texts (Turkish texts in Greek characters), because of their syncretistic nature, besides being predominantly translations from Greek, bear a great potential for the analysis of contact-induced phenomena in all language levels. On the other hand, Ottoman Turkish has been extensively studied in terms of language contact only in respect to the, mostly lexical, influence of Persian and Arabic in literary language, while spoken Ottoman seems much harder to be examined under this aspect. Although many Turkish texts in Greek characters have been produced in Istanbul and must be considered merely as a graphic variety of written Ottoman, other Karamanlidika texts, especially from the earlier period, reflect the spoken language in the chrono-geographical setting of 18th and 19th-century Asia Minor, and thus may serve as an excellent example for an analysis of especially syntactic contact features. Furthermore, they can also provide a basis as a model for the investigation of Ottoman religion-defined Turkish varieties in the Balkans, such as Gagauz and Ottoman Turkish in Cyrillic script, as well as for (former) graphically syncretistic Balkan varieties outside the Turkic realm, such as Bosnian, or Muslim-defined (“Aljamiado”) Greek in Crete and Epirus. The contribution is an attempt for a new approach to syncretistic writing and language systems in the framework of contact linguistics, taking as an example the first printed Karamanlidika book, Gülzar-i İman-i Mesihi (1718), comparing the Greek original with he Turkish translation.

Language contact in spoken Ottoman: observations on graphic syncretism in a Karamanlidika book (1718)

Matthias Kappler
2019-01-01

Abstract

Karamanlidika texts (Turkish texts in Greek characters), because of their syncretistic nature, besides being predominantly translations from Greek, bear a great potential for the analysis of contact-induced phenomena in all language levels. On the other hand, Ottoman Turkish has been extensively studied in terms of language contact only in respect to the, mostly lexical, influence of Persian and Arabic in literary language, while spoken Ottoman seems much harder to be examined under this aspect. Although many Turkish texts in Greek characters have been produced in Istanbul and must be considered merely as a graphic variety of written Ottoman, other Karamanlidika texts, especially from the earlier period, reflect the spoken language in the chrono-geographical setting of 18th and 19th-century Asia Minor, and thus may serve as an excellent example for an analysis of especially syntactic contact features. Furthermore, they can also provide a basis as a model for the investigation of Ottoman religion-defined Turkish varieties in the Balkans, such as Gagauz and Ottoman Turkish in Cyrillic script, as well as for (former) graphically syncretistic Balkan varieties outside the Turkic realm, such as Bosnian, or Muslim-defined (“Aljamiado”) Greek in Crete and Epirus. The contribution is an attempt for a new approach to syncretistic writing and language systems in the framework of contact linguistics, taking as an example the first printed Karamanlidika book, Gülzar-i İman-i Mesihi (1718), comparing the Greek original with he Turkish translation.
2019
Language Contact in the Balkans and Asia Minoir
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Thessaloniki_Language contact1.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Documento in Post-print
Licenza: Accesso gratuito (solo visione)
Dimensione 7.4 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
7.4 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in ARCA sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10278/3723460
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact