This study investigates the dynamics of knowledge partitioning, integration and coordination in vertical inter-firm relationships by addressing the following research questions: How and to what extent does product architecture shape the allocation of design tasks and inter-firm coordination? What variables do firms have to consider in making decisions concerning the organization of co-design projects? Following a ‘quasiexperimental’ research design approach, we conducted a comparative study of two similar auto component co-development projects (air-conditioning systems) carried out by a Japanese first-tier supplier with two European automakers. Despite the coeteris paribus conditions defined by the research design, we observed significant cross-firm differences in task and knowledge partitioning and in the relationship governance. The study shows that firm-specific factors (e.g. pre-existing technological and organizational capabilities) – not product architecture per se – resulted the key determinants of cross-firm differences. From this perspective our findings contributes to the broader debate about the codetermination of product architectures, firms’ vertical scope and industry architecture.

Product architecture, inter-firm vertical coordination and knowledge partitioning in the auto industry

ZIRPOLI, Francesco;
2009-01-01

Abstract

This study investigates the dynamics of knowledge partitioning, integration and coordination in vertical inter-firm relationships by addressing the following research questions: How and to what extent does product architecture shape the allocation of design tasks and inter-firm coordination? What variables do firms have to consider in making decisions concerning the organization of co-design projects? Following a ‘quasiexperimental’ research design approach, we conducted a comparative study of two similar auto component co-development projects (air-conditioning systems) carried out by a Japanese first-tier supplier with two European automakers. Despite the coeteris paribus conditions defined by the research design, we observed significant cross-firm differences in task and knowledge partitioning and in the relationship governance. The study shows that firm-specific factors (e.g. pre-existing technological and organizational capabilities) – not product architecture per se – resulted the key determinants of cross-firm differences. From this perspective our findings contributes to the broader debate about the codetermination of product architectures, firms’ vertical scope and industry architecture.
2009
6
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Zirpoli_Camuffo_EMR_published_2009.pdf

non disponibili

Tipologia: Abstract
Licenza: Licenza non definita
Dimensione 227.82 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
227.82 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in ARCA sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10278/34343
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 45
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 42
social impact