The major European testing agencies have calibrated their exams to the levels of language proficiency described in the Common European Framework. In Italy, where the Framework has been enthusiastically embraced, external exams are now frequently used within the state education system as they are believed to provide reliable, widely recognized independent assessment. But although these exams vary greatly, it is not always easy to find one which is entirely appropriate for a specific learning context. This article describes an experiment in 'co-certification', in which the University of Venice worked with Trinity College London to make an existing exam more appropriate for university students. This involved replacing 'creative writing' with 'critical writing' in the portfolio and the controlled written exam, and ensuring a 'university dimension' for the oral interview. The article reports on the modifications, and considers candidates' results from the perspectives of validity, washback and impact. It concludes that there may be other contexts in which co-certification is both possible and desirable.

Co-certification: a new direction for external assessment?

NEWBOLD, David John
2009-01-01

Abstract

The major European testing agencies have calibrated their exams to the levels of language proficiency described in the Common European Framework. In Italy, where the Framework has been enthusiastically embraced, external exams are now frequently used within the state education system as they are believed to provide reliable, widely recognized independent assessment. But although these exams vary greatly, it is not always easy to find one which is entirely appropriate for a specific learning context. This article describes an experiment in 'co-certification', in which the University of Venice worked with Trinity College London to make an existing exam more appropriate for university students. This involved replacing 'creative writing' with 'critical writing' in the portfolio and the controlled written exam, and ensuring a 'university dimension' for the oral interview. The article reports on the modifications, and considers candidates' results from the perspectives of validity, washback and impact. It concludes that there may be other contexts in which co-certification is both possible and desirable.
2009
63/1
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
ELTJ advance publication.pdf

non disponibili

Tipologia: Documento in Pre-print
Licenza: Accesso chiuso-personale
Dimensione 83.64 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
83.64 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in ARCA sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10278/29823
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 1
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 1
social impact